Configurable Build Attributes
Contents
- Example
- Configuration Conditions
- Defaults
- Custom Keys
- Platforms
- Short Keys
- Multiple Selects
- OR Chaining
- Custom Error Messages
- Rules Compatibility
- Bazel Query and Cquery
- FAQ
Configurable attributes, commonly known as select()
, is a Bazel feature that lets users toggle the values
of BUILD rule attributes at the command line.
This can be used, for example, for a multiplatform library that automatically chooses the appropriate implementation for the architecture, or for a feature-configurable binary that can be customized at build time.
Example
# myapp/BUILD
cc_binary(
name = "mybinary",
srcs = ["main.cc"],
deps = select({
":arm_build": [":arm_lib"],
":x86_debug_build": [":x86_dev_lib"],
"//conditions:default": [":generic_lib"],
}),
)
config_setting(
name = "arm_build",
values = {"cpu": "arm"},
)
config_setting(
name = "x86_debug_build",
values = {
"cpu": "x86",
"compilation_mode": "dbg",
},
)
This declares a cc_binary
that “chooses” its deps based on the flags at the
command line. Specficially, deps
becomes:
Command | deps = |
bazel build //myapp:mybinary --cpu=arm |
[":arm_lib"] |
bazel build //myapp:mybinary --c dbg --cpu=x86 |
[":x86_dev_lib"] |
bazel build //myapp:mybinary --cpu=ppc |
[":generic_lib"] |
bazel build //myapp:mybinary -c dbg --cpu=ppc |
[":generic_lib"] |
select()
serves as a placeholder for a value that will be chosen based on
configuration conditions. These conditions are labels that refer to
config_setting
targets. By using select()
in a configurable attribute, the attribute effectively takes on different values
when different conditions hold.
Matches must be unambiguous: either exactly one condition must match or, if
multiple conditions match, one’s values
must be a strict superset of all
others’. For example, values = {"cpu": "x86", "compilation_mode": "dbg"}
is an
unambiguous specialization of values = {"cpu": "x86"}
. The built-in condition
//conditions:default
automatically matches when nothing else
does.
This example uses deps
. But select()
works just as well on srcs
,
resources
, cmd
, or practically any other attribute. Only a small number of
attributes are non-configurable, and those are clearly annotated; for
instance, config_setting
’s own
values
attribute is non-configurable.
Certain attributes, like the tools
of a genrule
, have the effect of changing
the build parameters (such as the cpu) for all targets that transitively appear
beneath them. This will affect how conditions are matched within those targets
but not within the attribute that causes the change. That is, a select
in the
tools
attribute of a genrule
will work the same as a select
in the srcs
.
Configuration Conditions
Each key in a configurable attribute is a label reference to a
config_setting
target. This is just a
collection of expected command line flag settings. By encapsulating these in a
target, it’s easy to maintain “standard” conditions that can be referenced
across targets and BUILD files.
The core config_setting
syntax is:
config_setting(
name = "meaningful_condition_name",
values = {
"flag1": "expected_value1",
"flag2": "expected_value2",
...
},
)
flagN
is an arbitrary Bazel command line flag. value
is the expected value
for that flag. A config_setting
matches when all of its flags match (order
is irrelevant).
values
entries use the same parsing logic as at the actual command line. This
means:
values = { "compilation_mode": "opt" }
matchesbazel build -c opt ...
values = { "java_header_compilation": "true" }
matchesbazel build --java_header_compilation=1 ...
values = { "java_header_compilation": "0" }
matchesbazel build --nojava_header_compilation ...
config_setting
only works with flags that affect build rule output. For
example, --show_progress
isn’t allowed
because this only affects how Bazel reports progress to the user.
config_setting
semantics are intentionally simple. For example, there’s no
direct support for OR
chaining (although a
convenience function provides this). Consider writing
macros for complicated flag logic.
Defaults
The built-in condition //conditions:default
matches when no other condition
matches.
Because of the “exactly one match” rule, a configurable attribute with no match
and no default condition triggers a "no matching conditions"
error. This can
protect against silent failures from unexpected build flags:
# foo/BUILD
config_setting(
name = "foobar",
values = {"define": "foo=bar"},
)
cc_library(
name = "my_lib",
srcs = select({
":foobar": ["foobar_lib.cc"],
}),
)
$ bazel build //foo:my_lib --define foo=baz
ERROR: Configurable attribute "srcs" doesn't match this configuration (would
a default condition help?).
Conditions checked:
//foo:foobar
select()
can include a no_match_error
for custom
failure messages.
Custom Keys
Since config_setting
currently only supports built-in Bazel flags, the level
of custom conditioning it can support is limited. For example, there’s no Bazel
flag for IncludeSpecialProjectFeatureX
.
Plans for truly custom flags
are underway. In the meantime, --define
is
the best approach for these purposes.
--define
is a bit awkward to use and wasn’t originally designed for this
purpose. We recommend using it sparingly until true custom flags are available.
For example, don’t use --define
to specify multiple variants of top-level
binary. Just use multiple targets instead.
To trigger an arbitrary condition with --define
, write
config_setting(
name = "bar",
values = {"define": "foo=bar"},
)
config_setting(
name = "baz",
values = {"define": "foo=baz"},
)
and run $ bazel build //my:target --define foo=baz
.
The values
attribute can’t contain multiple define
s. This is
because each instance has the same dictionary key. To solve this, use
define_values
:
config_setting(
name = "bar_and_baz",
define_values = {
"foo": "bar", # matches --define foo=bar
"baz": "bat", # matches --define baz=bat
},
)
When define
s appear in both values
and define_values
, all must match for
the config_setting
to match.
Platforms
While the ability to specify multiple flags on the command line provides flexibility, it can also be burdensome to individually set each one every time you want to build a target. Platforms allow you to consolidate these into simple bundles.
# myapp/BUILD
sh_binary(
name = "my_rocks",
srcs = select({
":basalt": ["pyroxene.sh"],
":marble": ["calcite.sh"],
"//conditions:default": ["feldspar.sh"],
}),
)
config_setting(
name = "basalt",
constraint_values = [
":black",
":igneous",
],
)
config_setting(
name = "marble",
constraint_values = [
":white",
":metamorphic",
],
)
# constraint_setting acts as an enum type, and constraint_value as an enum value.
constraint_setting(name = "color")
constraint_value(name = "black", constraint_setting = "color")
constraint_value(name = "white", constraint_setting = "color")
constraint_setting(name = "texture")
constraint_value(name = "smooth", constraint_setting = "texture")
constraint_setting(name = "type")
constraint_value(name = "igneous", constraint_setting = "type")
constraint_value(name = "metamorphic", constraint_setting = "type")
platform(
name = "basalt_platform",
constraint_values = [
":black",
":igneous",
],
)
platform(
name = "marble_platform",
constraint_values = [
":white",
":smooth",
":metamorphic",
],
)
The platform can be specified on the command line. It activates the
config_setting
s that contain a subset of the platform’s constraint_values
,
allowing those config_setting
s to match in select()
expressions.
For example, in order to set the srcs
attribute of my_rocks
to calcite.sh
,
we can simply run
bazel build //my_app:my_rocks --platforms=//myapp:marble_platform
Without platforms, this might look something like
bazel build //my_app:my_rocks --define color=white --define texture=smooth --define type=metamorphic
Platforms are still under development. See the documentation and roadmap for details.
Short Keys
Since configuration keys are target labels, their names can get long and unwieldy. This can be mitigated with local variable definitions:
Before:
sh_binary(
name = "my_target",
srcs = select({
"//my/project/my/team/configs:config1": ["my_target_1.sh"],
"//my/project/my/team/configs:config2": ["my_target_2.sh"],
}),
)
After:
CONFIG1="//my/project/my/team/configs:config1"
CONFIG2="//my/project/my/team/configs:config2"
sh_binary(
name = "my_target",
srcs = select({
CONFIG1: ["my_target_1.sh"],
CONFIG2: ["my_target_2.sh"],
})
)
For more complex expressions, you can use macros:
Before:
# foo/BUILD
genrule(
name = "my_target",
srcs = [],
outs = ["my_target.out"],
cmd = select({
"//my/project/my/team/configs/config1": "echo custom val: this > $@",
"//my/project/my/team/configs/config2": "echo custom val: that > $@",
"//conditions:default": "echo default output > $@",
}),
)
After:
# foo/genrule_select.bzl
def select_echo(input_dict):
echo_cmd = "echo %s > $@"
out_dict = {"//conditions:default": echo_cmd % "default output"}
for (key, val) in input_dict.items():
cmd = echo_cmd % ("custom val: " + val)
out_dict["//my/project/my/team/configs/config" + key] = cmd
return select(out_dict)
# foo/BUILD
load("//foo:genrule_select.bzl", "select_echo")
genrule(
name = "my_target",
srcs = [],
outs = ["my_target.out"],
cmd = select_echo({
"1": "this",
"2": "that",
}),
)
Multiple Selects
select
can appear multiple times in the same attribute:
sh_binary(
name = "my_target",
srcs = ["always_include.sh"] +
select({
":armeabi_mode": ["armeabi_src.sh"],
":x86_mode": ["x86_src.sh"],
}) +
select({
":opt_mode": ["opt_extras.sh"],
":dbg_mode": ["dbg_extras.sh"],
}),
)
select
cannot appear inside another select
(i.e. AND
chaining). If you
need to AND
selects together, either use an intermediate target:
sh_binary(
name = "my_target",
srcs = ["always_include.sh"],
deps = select({
":armeabi_mode": [":armeabi_lib"],
...
}),
)
sh_library(
name = "armeabi_lib",
srcs = select({
":opt_mode": ["armeabi_with_opt.sh"],
...
}),
)
or write a macro to do the same thing automatically.
This approach doesn’t work for non-deps attributes (like
genrule:cmd). For these, extra config_settings
may be necessary:
config_setting(
name = "armeabi_and_opt",
values = {
"cpu": "armeabi",
"compilation_mode": "opt",
},
)
OR Chaining
Consider the following:
sh_binary(
name = "my_target",
srcs = ["always_include.sh"],
deps = select({
":config1": [":standard_lib"],
":config2": [":standard_lib"],
":config3": [":standard_lib"],
":config4": [":special_lib"],
}),
)
Most conditions evaluate to the same dep. But this syntax is verbose, hard to
maintain, and refactoring-unfriendly. It would be nice to not have to repeat
[":standard_lib"]
over and over.
One option is to predefine the declaration as a BUILD variable:
STANDARD_DEP = [":standard_lib"]
sh_binary(
name = "my_target",
srcs = ["always_include.sh"],
deps = select({
":config1": STANDARD_DEP,
":config2": STANDARD_DEP,
":config3": STANDARD_DEP,
":config4": [":special_lib"],
}),
)
This makes it easier to manage the dependency. But it still adds unnecessary duplication.
select()
doesn’t support native syntax for OR
ed conditions. For this, use
the Skylib utility selects
.
load("@bazel_skylib//:lib.bzl", "selects")
sh_binary(
name = "my_target",
srcs = ["always_include.sh"],
deps = selects.with_or({
(":config1", ":config2", ":config3"): [":standard_lib"],
":config4": [":special_lib"],
}),
)
This automatically expands the select
to the original syntax above.
For AND
chaining, see here.
Custom Error Messages
By default, when no condition matches, the owning target fails with the error:
ERROR: Configurable attribute "deps" doesn't match this configuration (would
a default condition help?).
Conditions checked:
//tools/cc_target_os:darwin
//tools/cc_target_os:android
This can be customized with no_match_error
:
cc_library(
name = "my_lib",
deps = select(
{
"//tools/cc_target_os:android": [":android_deps"],
"//tools/cc_target_os:windows": [":windows_deps"],
},
no_match_error = "Please build with an Android or Windows toolchain",
),
)
$ bazel build //foo:my_lib
ERROR: Configurable attribute "deps" doesn't match this configuration: Please
build with an Android or Windows toolchain
Rules Compatibility
Rule implementations receive the resolved values of configurable attributes. For example, given:
# myproject/BUILD
some_rule(
name = "my_target",
some_attr = select({
":foo_mode": [":foo"],
":bar_mode": [":bar"],
}),
)
$ bazel build //myproject/my_target --define mode=foo
Rule implementation code sees ctx.attr.some_attr
as [":foo"]
.
Macros can accept select()
clauses and pass them through to native
rules. But they cannot directly manipulate them. For example, there’s no way
for a macro to convert
select({"foo": "val"}, ...)
to
select({"foo": "val_with_suffix"}, ...)
This is for two reasons.
First, macros that need to know which path a select
will choose cannot work
because macros are evaluated in Bazel’s loading phase,
which occurs before flag values are known.
This is a core Bazel design restriction that’s unlikely to change any time soon.
Second, macros that just need to iterate over all select
paths, while
technically feasible, lack a coherent UI. Further design is necessary to change
this.
Bazel Query and Cquery
Bazel query
operates over Bazel’s loading phase. This means it doesn’t know what command line
flags will be applied to a target since those flags aren’t evaluated until later
in the build (during the analysis phase). So
the query
command can’t accurately determine which path a
configurable attribute will follow.
Bazel cquery
has the advantage of being able to parse build
flags and operating post-analysis phase so it correctly resolves configurable
attributes. It doesn’t have full feature parity with query but supports most
major functionality and is actively being worked on.
Querying the following build file…
# myproject/BUILD
cc_library(
name = "my_lib",
deps = select({
":long": [":foo_dep"],
":short": [":bar_dep"],
}),
)
config_setting(
name = "long",
values = {"define": "dog=dachshund"},
)
config_setting(
name = "short",
values = {"define": "dog=pug"},
)
…would return the following results.
$ bazel query 'deps(//myproject:my_lib)'
//myproject:my_lib
//myproject:foo_dep
//myproject:bar_dep
$ bazel cquery 'deps(//myproject:my_lib)' --define dog=pug
//myproject:my_lib
//myproject:bar_dep
FAQ
Why doesn’t select() work in macros?
select() does work in rules! See Rules compatibility for details.
The key issue this question usually means is that select() doesn’t work in macros. These are different than rules. See the documentation on rules and macros to understand the difference. Here’s an end-to-end example:
Define a rule and macro:
# myproject/defs.bzl
# Rule implementation: when an attribute is read, all select()s have already
# been resolved. So it looks like a plain old attribute just like any other.
def _impl(ctx):
name = ctx.attr.name
allcaps = ctx.attr.my_config_string.upper() # This works fine on all values.
print("My name is " + name + " with custom message: " + allcaps)
# Rule declaration:
my_custom_bazel_rule = rule(
implementation = _impl,
attrs = {"my_config_string": attr.string()},
)
# Macro declaration:
def my_custom_bazel_macro(name, my_config_string):
allcaps = my_config_string.upper() # This line won't work with select(s).
print("My name is " + name + " with custom message: " + allcaps)
Instantiate the rule and macro:
# myproject/BUILD
load("//myproject:defx.bzl", "my_custom_bazel_rule")
load("//myproject:defs.bzl", "my_custom_bazel_macro")
my_custom_bazel_rule(
name = "happy_rule",
my_config_string = select({
"//tools/target_cpu:x86": "first string",
"//tools/target_cpu:ppc": "second string",
}),
)
my_custom_bazel_macro(
name = "happy_macro",
my_config_string = "fixed string",
)
my_custom_bazel_macro(
name = "sad_macro",
my_config_string = select({
"//tools/target_cpu:x86": "first string",
"//tools/target_cpu:ppc": "other string",
}),
)
Building fails because sad_macro
can’t process the select()
:
$ bazel build //myproject:all
ERROR: /myworkspace/myproject/BUILD:17:1: Traceback
(most recent call last):
File "/myworkspace/myproject/BUILD", line 17
my_custom_bazel_macro(name = "sad_macro", my_config_stri..."}))
File "/myworkspace/myproject/defs.bzl", line 4, in
my_custom_bazel_macro
my_config_string.upper()
type 'select' has no method upper().
ERROR: error loading package 'myproject': Package 'myproject' contains errors.
Building succeeds when we comment out sad_macro
:
# Comment out sad_macro so it doesn't mess up the build.
$ bazel build //myproject:all
DEBUG: /myworkspace/myproject/defs.bzl:5:3: My name is happy_macro with custom message: FIXED STRING.
DEBUG: /myworkspace/myproject/hi.bzl:15:3: My name is happy_rule with custom message: FIRST STRING.
This is impossible to change because by definition macros are evaluated before Bazel reads the build’s command line flags. That means there isn’t enough information to evaluate select()s.
Macros can, however, pass select()
s as opaque blobs to rules:
# myproject/defs.bzl
def my_custom_bazel_macro(name, my_config_string):
print("Invoking macro " + name)
my_custom_bazel_rule(
name = name + "_as_target",
my_config_string = my_config_string,
)
$ bazel build //myproject:sad_macro_less_sad
DEBUG: /myworkspace/myproject/defs.bzl:23:3: Invoking macro sad_macro_less_sad.
DEBUG: /myworkspace/myproject/defs.bzl:15:3: My name is sad_macro_less_sad with custom message: FIRST STRING.
Why does select() always return true?
Because macros (but not rules) by definition can’t evaluate select(s), any attempt to do so usually produces a an error:
ERROR: /myworkspace/myproject/BUILD:17:1: Traceback
(most recent call last):
File "/myworkspace/myproject/BUILD", line 17
my_custom_bazel_macro(name = "sad_macro", my_config_stri..."}))
File "/myworkspace/myproject/defs.bzl", line 4, in
my_custom_bazel_macro
my_config_string.upper()
type 'select' has no method upper().
Booleans are a special case that fail silently, so you should be particularly vigilant with them:
$ cat myproject/defs.bzl
def my_boolean_macro(boolval):
print("TRUE" if boolval else "FALSE")
$ cat myproject/BUILD
load("//myproject:defx.bzl", "my_boolean_macro")
my_boolean_macro(
boolval = select({
"//tools/target_cpu:x86": True,
"//tools/target_cpu:ppc": False,
}),
)
$ bazel build //myproject:all --cpu=x86
DEBUG: /myworkspace/myproject/defs.bzl:4:3: TRUE.
$ bazel build //myproject:all --cpu=ppc
DEBUG: /myworkspace/myproject/defs.bzl:4:3: TRUE.
This happens because macros don’t understand the contents of select()
.
So what they’re really evaluting is the select()
object itself. According to
Pythonic design
standards, all objects aside from a very small number of exceptions
automatically return true.
Can I read select() like a dict?
Fine. Macros can’t evaluate select(s) because macros are evaluated before Bazel knows what the command line flags are.
Can macros at least read the select()
’s dictionary, say, to add an extra
suffix to each branch?
Conceptually this is possible. But this isn’t yet implemented and is not
currently prioritized.
What you can do today is prepare a straight dictionary, then feed it into a
select()
:
$ cat myproject/defs.bzl
def selecty_genrule(name, select_cmd):
for key in select_cmd.keys():
select_cmd[key] += " WITH SUFFIX"
native.genrule(
name = name,
outs = [name + ".out"],
srcs = [],
cmd = "echo " + select(select_cmd + {"//conditions:default": "default"})
+ " > $@"
)
$ cat myproject/BUILD
selecty_genrule(
name = "selecty",
select_cmd = {
"//tools/target_cpu:x86": "x86 mode",
},
)
$ bazel build //testapp:selecty --cpu=x86 && cat bazel-genfiles/testapp/selecty.out
x86 mode WITH SUFFIX
If you’d like to support both select()
and native types, you can do this:
$ cat myproject/defs.bzl
def selecty_genrule(name, select_cmd):
cmd_suffix = ""
if type(select_cmd) == "string":
cmd_suffix = select_cmd + " WITH SUFFIX"
elif type(select_cmd) == "dict":
for key in select_cmd.keys():
select_cmd[key] += " WITH SUFFIX"
cmd_suffix = select(select_cmd + {"//conditions:default": "default"})
native.genrule(
name = name,
outs = [name + ".out"],
srcs = [],
cmd = "echo " + cmd_suffix + "> $@",
)